2006 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo (103 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 602 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo | 2003 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
| Model | Rezzo | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2330 mm |
