2006 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 573 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo. (142 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Rezzo | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Rezzo | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 87 L |