2006 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 137 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo. (103 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Because 2007 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo. (142 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Rezzo | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Rezzo | Commodore |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |