2006 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo (119 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo. (176 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Rezzo | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Rezzo | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1381 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |