2006 Chevrolet Spark vs. 1981 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Spark weights approximately 705 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Spark is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Spark will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Spark | 1981 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Spark | 626 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2520 mm |