2006 Chevrolet Spark vs. 2004 Rover City
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover City. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover City would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover City is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Spark is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Spark. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Spark | 2004 Rover City | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Spark | City |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2410 mm |