2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Triumph 1800 weights approximately 14 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet SSR | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | SSR | 1800 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1774 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 6.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2550 mm |
