2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Riley RM A weights approximately 157 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet SSR | 1954 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
| Model | SSR | RM A |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2870 mm |
