2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP) has 361 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 132 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet SSR | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | SSR | Master RR |
Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 40 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 75 L |