2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 308 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 138 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet SSR | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | SSR | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 57 L |
