2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser. (155 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 822 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser. (300 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet SSR | 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | SSR | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 8.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2740 mm |