2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet SSR | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | SSR | FTO |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
