2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 752 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet SSR | 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | SSR | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 0 HP |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2730 mm |
