2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1999 Nissan XVL

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan XVL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan XVL would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1999 Nissan XVL. (156 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan XVL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan XVL weights approximately 182 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.

Because 2006 Chevrolet SSR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet SSR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan XVL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan XVL. (310 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan XVL. 1999 Nissan XVL has automatic transmission and 2006 Chevrolet SSR has manual transmission. 2006 Chevrolet SSR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan XVL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: