2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1247 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | SSR | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3510 mm |