2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2000 Mazda B2500

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 319 more horse power than 2000 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 662 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.

Because 2000 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda B2500.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet SSR 2000 Mazda B2500
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model SSR B2500
Year Released 2006 2000
Body Type Pickup Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5965 cc 2499 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 401 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 542 Nm 194 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Weight 1078 kg 1740 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1630 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2990 mm