2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota F-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota F-1 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 2002 Toyota F-1. (183 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota F-1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota F-1 weights approximately 532 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota F-1. (430 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota F-1.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | SSR | F-1 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 75 L |