2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1410 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-350. (475 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | SSR | E-350 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 132 L |