2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP) has 191 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 839 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (344 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | SSR | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1917 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 85 L |