2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, both 2006 Chevrolet SSR and 2006 SsangYong Stavic were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 2006 Chevrolet SSR has manual transmission. 2006 Chevrolet SSR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Chevrolet | SsangYong |
| Model | SSR | Stavic |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 80 L |
