2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2008 Fiat Palio
To start off, 2008 Fiat Palio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Chevrolet SSR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet SSR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 440 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Palio. (102 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2008 Fiat Palio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | SSR | Palio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1241 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 70.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 78.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 47 L |