2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 592 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Because 2008 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (265 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
| Model | SSR | KB |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3165 cc |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1670 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 17.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 75 L |
