2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 368 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | SSR | Condor |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |