2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 788 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.

Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda BT-50.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet SSR 2009 Mazda BT-50
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model SSR BT-50
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Pickup Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5965 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 401 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 542 Nm 330 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91.4 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.9:1 18.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1078 kg 1866 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1630 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.8 L/100km 8.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]