2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP) has 333 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2006 Chevrolet SSR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet SSR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | SSR | Pixo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 68 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2360 mm |