2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (154 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50.

Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (380 Nm @ 180 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda BT-50.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet SSR 2011 Mazda BT-50
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model SSR BT-50
Year Released 2006 2011
Body Type Pickup Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5965 cc 2953 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 401 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3200 RPM
Torque 542 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 180 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 96.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91.4 mm 102 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.9:1 18.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Height 1630 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 3010 mm