2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 631 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ferrari California. (504 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ferrari California.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet SSR | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
| Model | SSR | California |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 78 L |
