2006 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 864 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Tahoe | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4802 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |