2006 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe (285 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe (401 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tahoe | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4802 cc | 1071 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2370 mm |