2006 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe (295 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 450 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tahoe | SUW |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 1097 cc |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 71 L |