2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 5,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (395 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 102 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (542 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | TrailBlazer | CJ |
Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 326 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2060 mm |