2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 7 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | TrailBlazer | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 376 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2540 mm |