2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1969 Datsun 1600
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Datsun 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Datsun 1600 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer has automatic transmission and 1969 Datsun 1600 has manual transmission. 1969 Datsun 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1969 Datsun 1600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Datsun |
Model | TrailBlazer | 1600 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |