2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1969 Mazda 110 S
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (292 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1969 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 784 kg more than 1969 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1969 Mazda 110 S | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | TrailBlazer | 110 S |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2360 mm |
