2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (292 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 502 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | TrailBlazer | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 376 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2700 mm |