2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1982 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1253 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1982 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | TrailBlazer | XJR |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2153 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 90 L |