2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1995 Daewoo No 1
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (292 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (376 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1995 Daewoo No 1 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
| Model | TrailBlazer | No 1 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
