2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 200 weights approximately 107 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
| Model | TrailBlazer | 200 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 291 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1410 mm |
