2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 80 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | TrailBlazer | Challenger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 0 HP |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2730 mm |