2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2002 Jaguar X400
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (292 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (376 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2002 Jaguar X400 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | TrailBlazer | X400 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 525 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 69 L |
