2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 5,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (395 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1288 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (542 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (353 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | TrailBlazer | Express |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 353 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 2366 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 6210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 2090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3940 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 117 L |