2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2009 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2009 Nissan NP300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2009 Nissan NP300. (131 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan NP300.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (377 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan NP300. (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan NP300.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2009 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | TrailBlazer | NP300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 377 Nm | 304 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 75 L |