2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2010 Hyundai H1
To start off, 2010 Hyundai H1 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2010 Hyundai H1. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2010 Hyundai H1.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (377 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Hyundai H1. (224 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Hyundai H1.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2010 Hyundai H1 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hyundai |
Model | TrailBlazer | H1 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 377 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 75 L |