2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP) has 192 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer has automatic transmission and 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet has manual transmission. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Chevrolet | Aston Martin |
Model | TrailBlazer | Cygnet |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 99 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 4 L/100km |