2006 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1954 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 710 kg more than 1954 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Uplander | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Talbot |
| Model | Uplander | Baby |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2693 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 3130 mm |
