2006 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1958 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (201 HP) has 152 more horse power than 1958 Wartburg 312. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1958 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 1690 kg more than 1958 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (293 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Wartburg 312. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Uplander | 1958 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Wartburg |
Model | Uplander | 312 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3490 cc | 992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 293 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 7.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2660 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2460 mm |