2006 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Uplander has automatic transmission and 1965 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1965 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Uplander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Uplander | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Uplander | Elan |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
