2006 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (202 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 1505 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Uplander | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Uplander | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2010 mm |
