2006 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 1981 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (293 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (127 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Uplander | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Uplander | 240 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 293 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2660 mm |