2006 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (202 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 1538 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Uplander | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Uplander | 9 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 38 L |